Why software must be free¶
On this page we try to explain why we believe it to be realistic. You don’t need to believe in our vision as much as we do, you may use our software and our services even if you are skeptical.
Our customers are free to choose another service provider at any moment without loosing the product that has grown by our collaboration. This is our warranty to a relationship that fosters long-lasting satisfaction for both you and us.
An understandable and often-heard reaction is to say “So what? For me as a non-expert, software products like MS Windows, MS Office and Google Maps are easier and cheaper to use than Linux, LibreOffice and OpenStreetMap”.
Yes, it’s easier, and sometimes cheaper. Using free instead of proprietary software is like living in your own house instead of living in a rented one. It has advantages and disadvantages. As a house owner you have more rights, but you also have more responsibilities.
The question is whether you care about your independence or not. Using proprietary software makes you depend on its vendor. If you have no problem with depending on giants like Microsoft or Google, then feel free to stop reading this page. God bless you.
There are a few aspects of software business you might care about even if you are not an IT expert:
As an end user you actually are an important contributor in the software development process. When you have a problem with a software product, then its owners should be thankful that you take the time of explaining them your problem. Every support request increases the value of their product. Most business models make you pay for getting support although in a certain way it should be the opposite.
Using a software product makes you depend on its owner. The owner decides which features to include or remove in new versions, and which versions they continue to maintain. The owner decides about the price to pay. The owner has motivation to bind you to their product.
Our software is more than just “free” or “open-source”: we call it sustainably free. That’s actually a neologism. It means that we develop and maintain it using a business model that is based on sharing rather than limiting (reserving) the right to use it.
While Free Software becomes more and more popular, it gets increasingly misused by players who still rely on some proprietary part for generating revenue.
They gain control over the usage rights on some part of the product like an installer or a front end.
They use a liberal free license, which leaves them the legal back door of switching to a proprietary license when the product has acquired enough popularity.
When such attempts are disclosed, they lead to a free (but weakened) fork in the best case, or to the death of the product in the worst case.
A legally free software product may become non-free when one of its components is non-free. Documentation is an important part of a software product. An otherwise free product is not sustainable when documentation and expert knowledge about it is controlled by a single entity.
This page explains why we are proud to say that Synodal Software is not just “free” but sustainably free.
Synodal Software can be used by anybody and forever to write a new application or host an existing one. You can do the work yourself or delegate it to a service provider of your choice.
- intellectual work¶
When you do the work of explaining something in public, then you become the author of that work.
Your work can be a poem, an article, a book, a picture, a movie, a song, a scientific report, just to mention the major types.
Intellectual work is stored on a medium. Before the digital era this medium was paper, cellulose and magnetic tape.
- software product¶
This definition may differ from definitions used in proprietary software business where also compiled (non-source) content is considered a usable product.
- copyright holder¶
The legal or natural person who published an intellectual work the source files of a software product and them. Modified or unmodified copies of the source files may be used only with permission of the copyright holder who usually specifies a license to regulate how his work may be used.
- vendor lock-in¶
The situation of a customer who has become dependent on a vendor for products and services, unable to switching to another vendor without substantial costs or other obstacles.
- proprietary software¶
Software that is published under a license that reserves to its copyright holder the right of sharing the software or derivative work.
- Open-source software¶
Software for which the customer is given permission to consult the source code. This does not necessarily mean Free Software.
- Free Software¶
Software that is published by its copyright holder under a license that permits and encourages sharing of the software or derivative work.
- Sustainably Free Software¶
Software that is developed and maintained using a business model that is based on sharing rather than limiting usage rights.
Software licenses are either free or proprietary. Free software licenses are either permissive or protective.
- proprietary license¶
- free software license¶
A license where the copyright holder publicly gives certain usage rights to everybody under certain conditions.
- permissive Free Software license¶
A free software license that sets minimal requirements about how the software or derivative work may be redistributed.
An example is the BSD License.
- protective Free Software license¶
A free software license that requires redistribution of derivative work to be licensed under the same license.
An example is the GNU General Public License..